Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26201 - 26210 of 62739 for child support.
Search results 26201 - 26210 of 62739 for child support.
State v. Towanka S. King
in support of the search warrant that was based, in part, on the officer’s search of King’s sport utility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19811 - 2005-10-03
in support of the search warrant that was based, in part, on the officer’s search of King’s sport utility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19811 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for an involuntary medication order to help restore Lucy to competency. In support of its motion, the DHS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914936 - 2025-02-18
for an involuntary medication order to help restore Lucy to competency. In support of its motion, the DHS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914936 - 2025-02-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence. Green also contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15
to suppress evidence. Green also contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85795 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
The Estate of Harvey L. Tucker v. Forest County Potawatomi Community
of the exceptions enumerated in that section. Id. ¶8 The record supports the court’s implicit determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5677 - 2017-09-19
of the exceptions enumerated in that section. Id. ¶8 The record supports the court’s implicit determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5677 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Linda M. Pederson v. Jerry Anibas
conversion. Because the record supports the court’s determination, we reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3206 - 2017-09-19
conversion. Because the record supports the court’s determination, we reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3206 - 2017-09-19
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
the evidence presented at his parole revocation hearing was sufficient to support the conclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13175 - 2005-03-31
the evidence presented at his parole revocation hearing was sufficient to support the conclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13175 - 2005-03-31
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
the evidence presented at his parole revocation hearing was sufficient to support the conclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13174 - 2005-03-31
the evidence presented at his parole revocation hearing was sufficient to support the conclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13174 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Bintz
was insufficient to support his conviction. Bintz’s arguments are unpersuasive, and we affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3350 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to support his conviction. Bintz’s arguments are unpersuasive, and we affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3350 - 2005-03-31
Ronald Wolfe v. Kenneth Morgan
evidence to support the charges. Because we conclude that the committee complied with the applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11694 - 2005-03-31
evidence to support the charges. Because we conclude that the committee complied with the applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11694 - 2005-03-31
Dings Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of Dings.[1] Dings argues: (1) that the award is not supported by credible and substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13786 - 2005-03-31
of Dings.[1] Dings argues: (1) that the award is not supported by credible and substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13786 - 2005-03-31