Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26211 - 26220 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 26211 - 26220 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Henry Bowles
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in excluding evidence that, he argues, would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14877 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in excluding evidence that, he argues, would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of trial counsel in connection with arguments made in a motion to suppress. We affirm. ΒΆ2 Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257582 - 2020-04-15
of trial counsel in connection with arguments made in a motion to suppress. We affirm. ΒΆ2 Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257582 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, following a jury trial during which blood test evidence was presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90208 - 2014-09-15
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, following a jury trial during which blood test evidence was presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90208 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sally A. Drew
argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by allowing a humane officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6869 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by allowing a humane officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6869 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing. Storzer alternatively argues he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
a hearing. Storzer alternatively argues he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
trial strategy. We reject the closing argument issue. However, because we conclude that Eric
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61888 - 2011-03-28
trial strategy. We reject the closing argument issue. However, because we conclude that Eric
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61888 - 2011-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS
the verdict was perverse and damages were inadequate. She also requests a new trial in the interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79932 - 2012-03-26
the verdict was perverse and damages were inadequate. She also requests a new trial in the interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79932 - 2012-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to interview two witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258850 - 2020-04-28
claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to interview two witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258850 - 2020-04-28
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
, was incorrect. The State contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
, was incorrect. The State contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and that his trial counsel was ineffective because he did not adequately explain the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132842 - 2017-09-21
and that his trial counsel was ineffective because he did not adequately explain the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132842 - 2017-09-21