Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26221 - 26230 of 58254 for speedy trial.
Search results 26221 - 26230 of 58254 for speedy trial.
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
Education Milwaukee Municipal Judge Derek Mosley, right, speaks during a mock trial exercise
/news/thirdbranch/mar22/judedmuni.htm - 2026-01-13
Education Milwaukee Municipal Judge Derek Mosley, right, speaks during a mock trial exercise
/news/thirdbranch/mar22/judedmuni.htm - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concurrently. Kerrigan argues on appeal that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
concurrently. Kerrigan argues on appeal that he is entitled to plea withdrawal because his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
[PDF]
Russell W. Weber v. Terrence M. Crossin
in favor of Terrence and Patricia Crossin after a bench trial.1 The Webers contend that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15503 - 2017-09-21
in favor of Terrence and Patricia Crossin after a bench trial.1 The Webers contend that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patricia H.S. v. Richard Lee R.
. NETTESHEIM, J. Richard Lee R. appeals from trial court orders terminating his parental rights to his two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11229 - 2017-09-19
. NETTESHEIM, J. Richard Lee R. appeals from trial court orders terminating his parental rights to his two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11229 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott Morrissey
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. This court agrees and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16080 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. This court agrees and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert S. O'Kon v. Frederick A. Laude
, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ΒΆ1 NETTESHEIM, J. By summary judgment, the trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6984 - 2017-09-20
, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ΒΆ1 NETTESHEIM, J. By summary judgment, the trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6984 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Linda L. McCoy
violated the Fourth Amendment. The trial court denied the motions to suppress and dismiss. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20295 - 2017-09-21
violated the Fourth Amendment. The trial court denied the motions to suppress and dismiss. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20295 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Farr
) that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury with respect to the weapons enhancer. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11376 - 2017-09-19
) that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury with respect to the weapons enhancer. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11376 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frederick F. Hafemann
, and carrying a concealed weapon. On appeal, Hafemann argues that the trial court should have suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
, and carrying a concealed weapon. On appeal, Hafemann argues that the trial court should have suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
Susan Monfils v. Marlyn Charles
does not fall within the meaning of the business exclusion.[1] We conclude that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12387 - 2005-03-31
does not fall within the meaning of the business exclusion.[1] We conclude that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12387 - 2005-03-31