Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26241 - 26250 of 41998 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 26241 - 26250 of 41998 for jury duty/1000.
State v. Markham O. Mayne
and was then convicted by a jury of kidnapping, eight counts of sexual assault with a weapon, and endangering safety. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16256 - 2005-03-31
and was then convicted by a jury of kidnapping, eight counts of sexual assault with a weapon, and endangering safety. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16256 - 2005-03-31
Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Tonya B.
, who entered a denial to the allegations in the petitions and requested a jury trial. The jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5849 - 2005-03-31
, who entered a denial to the allegations in the petitions and requested a jury trial. The jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5849 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is harmless when it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found the defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333383 - 2021-02-09
is harmless when it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found the defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333383 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
jury trial. In fact, the record shows that at the “motion to reopen,” Doerr explicitly abandoned his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
jury trial. In fact, the record shows that at the “motion to reopen,” Doerr explicitly abandoned his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. We affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In February 2010, a jury found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104314 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. We affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In February 2010, a jury found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104314 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
either already been litigated or are procedurally barred, we affirm. Background In 2003, a jury found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103068 - 2013-10-10
either already been litigated or are procedurally barred, we affirm. Background In 2003, a jury found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103068 - 2013-10-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
discretion in terminating Shunda P.’s parental rights to Dimitri. We affirm. ¶2 A jury determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26677 - 2014-09-15
discretion in terminating Shunda P.’s parental rights to Dimitri. We affirm. ¶2 A jury determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26677 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reconsideration1 of his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18) motion. We affirm. ¶2 A jury found Glass guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295882 - 2020-10-14
reconsideration1 of his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2017-18) motion. We affirm. ¶2 A jury found Glass guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295882 - 2020-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed, understood and signed the completed plea questionnaire form and attachments, including the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162400 - 2017-09-21
reviewed, understood and signed the completed plea questionnaire form and attachments, including the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James D. Jacobson
that the jury was not given the opportunity to hear important testimony that bore on an important issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8556 - 2017-09-19
that the jury was not given the opportunity to hear important testimony that bore on an important issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8556 - 2017-09-19