Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26241 - 26250 of 45816 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 26241 - 26250 of 45816 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the ineffective assistance test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one of them. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760158 - 2024-02-07
of the ineffective assistance test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one of them. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760158 - 2024-02-07
State v. William H. Roberts
and glassy. Roberts did not cooperate and refused to take any chemical test to determine if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
and glassy. Roberts did not cooperate and refused to take any chemical test to determine if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sean M. Daley
appropriate, since it is a deterrent to “defendants testing the waters for possible punishments” and acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24775 - 2006-05-30
appropriate, since it is a deterrent to “defendants testing the waters for possible punishments” and acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24775 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tony B. Oliver
for the prejudice prong of the test is whether the alleged deficiency so undermined the proper functioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5290 - 2017-09-19
for the prejudice prong of the test is whether the alleged deficiency so undermined the proper functioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5290 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circumstances rather than providing “discrete elements of a more rigid test.” Id. Thus, if an informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31892 - 2014-09-15
of the circumstances rather than providing “discrete elements of a more rigid test.” Id. Thus, if an informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31892 - 2014-09-15
State v. Cynthia S.
of parental rights…. Under the Bangert test we should proceed no further since Steven H. has failed to meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
of parental rights…. Under the Bangert test we should proceed no further since Steven H. has failed to meet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not satisfy the new factor test we set forth in State v. Doe, 2005 WI App 68, 280 Wis. 2d 731, 697 N.W.2d 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32179 - 2008-03-24
not satisfy the new factor test we set forth in State v. Doe, 2005 WI App 68, 280 Wis. 2d 731, 697 N.W.2d 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32179 - 2008-03-24
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
, 482 N.W.2d 364, 368 (1992). The test to review the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
, 482 N.W.2d 364, 368 (1992). The test to review the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian Swift
conclude that Swift satisfied the first prong of the newly discovered evidence test, which requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6063 - 2005-03-31
conclude that Swift satisfied the first prong of the newly discovered evidence test, which requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6063 - 2005-03-31