Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26241 - 26250 of 64160 for records.
Search results 26241 - 26250 of 64160 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
will affirm if the decision is made based upon the facts of record and in reliance on the appropriate law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41682 - 2009-10-06
will affirm if the decision is made based upon the facts of record and in reliance on the appropriate law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41682 - 2009-10-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786865 - 2024-04-09
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786865 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Milwaukee Board of Review. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107294 - 2017-09-21
of Milwaukee Board of Review. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mary Jo Gray v. Mark Gerard Gray
Jo’s argument that 25% of Mark’s income exceeds the $1,075 minimum is not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3312 - 2017-09-19
Jo’s argument that 25% of Mark’s income exceeds the $1,075 minimum is not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3312 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. (Whereupon discussion was had off the record between the defendant and counsel.) THE COURT: We’re back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40991 - 2009-09-21
. (Whereupon discussion was had off the record between the defendant and counsel.) THE COURT: We’re back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40991 - 2009-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark S. Rayford
Statutes are to the 1995-96 version unless otherwise indicated. 3 The record reflects there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3649 - 2017-09-19
Statutes are to the 1995-96 version unless otherwise indicated. 3 The record reflects there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3649 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592511 - 2022-11-22
so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592511 - 2022-11-22
CA Blank Order
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135179 - 2015-02-12
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135179 - 2015-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Roger J. Dotz
a sentence reduction. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9610 - 2017-09-19
a sentence reduction. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9610 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
our review of the briefs and record, 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233645 - 2019-01-30
our review of the briefs and record, 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233645 - 2019-01-30