Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26251 - 26260 of 33987 for dismissed.
Search results 26251 - 26260 of 33987 for dismissed.
State v. Christopher Butler
, the substantial battery charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Butler was ultimately convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2974 - 2005-03-31
, the substantial battery charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Butler was ultimately convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2974 - 2005-03-31
City of Mondovi v. Gregory A. Laehn
trial, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on Laehn’s motion to dismiss the case on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3370 - 2005-03-31
trial, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on Laehn’s motion to dismiss the case on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3370 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to try that. The State then reopened and dismissed count one. Duke appeals from the order denying a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09
to try that. The State then reopened and dismissed count one. Duke appeals from the order denying a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the no-merit report and dismissed the appeal without prejudice on November 16, 2015. ¶7 Rash then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207696 - 2018-01-30
the no-merit report and dismissed the appeal without prejudice on November 16, 2015. ¶7 Rash then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207696 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Sean P. Tate
, dismissed the No. 98-0679-CR 4 charges against the defendant. The State appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13716 - 2014-09-15
, dismissed the No. 98-0679-CR 4 charges against the defendant. The State appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13716 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Creamery and Farm. We remand for entry of summary judgment in favor of GreenStone and dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132739 - 2017-09-21
of Creamery and Farm. We remand for entry of summary judgment in favor of GreenStone and dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132739 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unactionable “puffery”; and that its remaining claims should be dismissed because it did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83530 - 2014-09-15
unactionable “puffery”; and that its remaining claims should be dismissed because it did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83530 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
erred in dismissing his appeal. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 About 11:00 p.m. on April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
erred in dismissing his appeal. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 About 11:00 p.m. on April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Dorsey
charge was dismissed. In exchange, Dorsey agreed to plead no contest. On March 17, 2003, he entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18503 - 2017-09-21
charge was dismissed. In exchange, Dorsey agreed to plead no contest. On March 17, 2003, he entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the proposed meeting location. ¶3 Hamilton moved to dismiss the charge, arguing the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
at the proposed meeting location. ¶3 Hamilton moved to dismiss the charge, arguing the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15