Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26251 - 26260 of 58890 for do.
Search results 26251 - 26260 of 58890 for do.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after seeing them, do you believe that your client is also making a knowing, willing, and voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610529 - 2023-02-09
after seeing them, do you believe that your client is also making a knowing, willing, and voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610529 - 2023-02-09
[PDF]
Racine County Human Services Department v. Lakisha G.
chance to contact [her] and bring her in. I do have a current address and phone number for her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7013 - 2017-09-20
chance to contact [her] and bring her in. I do have a current address and phone number for her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7013 - 2017-09-20
State v. Luis R. Davila-Diaz
what happened? A. Capone [Vargas] was actually doing more of the talking, and Cuco [Davila-Diaz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6511 - 2005-03-31
what happened? A. Capone [Vargas] was actually doing more of the talking, and Cuco [Davila-Diaz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6511 - 2005-03-31
Margaret Hoffman v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
of the statute is unambiguous, we do not look beyond the statutory language; we simply apply the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4640 - 2005-03-31
of the statute is unambiguous, we do not look beyond the statutory language; we simply apply the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4640 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lenny P. Keding
letters; purchasing items on a credit card while prohibited from doing so; and lying to his agent. ¶9
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16399 - 2005-03-31
letters; purchasing items on a credit card while prohibited from doing so; and lying to his agent. ¶9
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16399 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
conditions refer to Warren [W.], disregard that matter. Do not bring Warren [W.] into this matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
conditions refer to Warren [W.], disregard that matter. Do not bring Warren [W.] into this matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion to do so because we did not address these issues in Swiderski II, and a circuit court “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224003 - 2018-10-30
discretion to do so because we did not address these issues in Swiderski II, and a circuit court “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224003 - 2018-10-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), and Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012)—also do not require it. 6 The prosecutor did not interfere
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225415 - 2018-10-30
), and Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012)—also do not require it. 6 The prosecutor did not interfere
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225415 - 2018-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2019AP2321-CR 4 ¶7 The circuit court accepted Reiher’s no contest pleas. In so doing, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
. No. 2019AP2321-CR 4 ¶7 The circuit court accepted Reiher’s no contest pleas. In so doing, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not justified. ¶19 We do not read Harbor to foreclose a circuit court from considering whether a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242358 - 2019-06-18
was not justified. ¶19 We do not read Harbor to foreclose a circuit court from considering whether a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242358 - 2019-06-18