Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26261 - 26270 of 69380 for as he.
Search results 26261 - 26270 of 69380 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for resentencing or sentence modification. He also appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145725 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion for resentencing or sentence modification. He also appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145725 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after a jury trial of second-degree sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108160 - 2017-09-21
after a jury trial of second-degree sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108160 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) postconviction No. 2011AP824 2 motion.1 He argues that his postconviction counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80704 - 2014-09-15
) postconviction No. 2011AP824 2 motion.1 He argues that his postconviction counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80704 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
substance, first offense, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(am). Netzer argues on appeal that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152793 - 2017-09-21
substance, first offense, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(am). Netzer argues on appeal that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152793 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Greenwood argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143667 - 2015-06-29
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Greenwood argues he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143667 - 2015-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
he said, the victim identified the intruder as Maus. At the preliminary hearing, the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115637 - 2014-06-30
he said, the victim identified the intruder as Maus. At the preliminary hearing, the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115637 - 2014-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
O’Connell was charged with operating while under the influence of an intoxicant, third offense.[4] He moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46760 - 2010-02-08
O’Connell was charged with operating while under the influence of an intoxicant, third offense.[4] He moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46760 - 2010-02-08
Village of Deerfield v. Curtis J. Philipp
of ordinances of the Village of Deerfield, and from an order denying his postverdict motions. He argues that (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11782 - 2011-09-01
of ordinances of the Village of Deerfield, and from an order denying his postverdict motions. He argues that (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11782 - 2011-09-01
COURT OF APPEALS
(2009-10) postconviction motion.[1] He argues that his postconviction counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
(2009-10) postconviction motion.[1] He argues that his postconviction counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
or sentence modification. He also appeals the order denying reconsideration. Because we conclude that Keizer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145725 - 2015-08-10
or sentence modification. He also appeals the order denying reconsideration. Because we conclude that Keizer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145725 - 2015-08-10