Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26261 - 26270 of 57167 for id.

State v. Jason D. VanStraten
, this court owes no deference to the decision of the lower court on this issue. Id. ¶7 Once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6881 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James W. Jones
was practically certain to cause the death of another human being.’” Id., 196 Wis.2d at 321, 538 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13527 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
sentencing determination. Id. ¶7 The trial court first observed it was sentencing Harrison for “very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55260 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
of law without deference to the No. 2009AP403 3 trial court’s determination.” Id. at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48816 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
facts. See id. The circuit court was entitled to deem the victim’s testimony credible even
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305616 - 2020-11-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. (quoted source omitted). We will affirm a circuit court’s decision to grant a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82887 - 2014-09-15

Manitowoc County v. Denise G.
within 15 days ....” See id. The trial court found that while counsel's failure
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9938 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
process to reach a conclusion a reasonable judge could reach. See id. Finally, the report considers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136709 - 2015-03-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2012AP836 4 that the Board reasonably could have reached the determination it did. Id., ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92670 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
No. 2015AP2048 3 that the court of appeals did not discuss.” See id., ¶83. He must do something
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171773 - 2017-09-21