Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26261 - 26270 of 46074 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 26261 - 26270 of 46074 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the manifest injustice test. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133770 - 2017-09-21
the manifest injustice test. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133770 - 2017-09-21
State v. Francis E. Altman
The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
The prejudice prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26043 - 2006-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
injustice’ test requires a defendant to show ‘a serious flaw in the fundamental integrity of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103080 - 2017-09-21
injustice’ test requires a defendant to show ‘a serious flaw in the fundamental integrity of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103080 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The five-prong Pulizzano2 test requires a defendant to show: (1) that the prior acts clearly occurred; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76501 - 2014-09-15
). The five-prong Pulizzano2 test requires a defendant to show: (1) that the prior acts clearly occurred; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76501 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Stewart’s home where they arrested Stewart and recovered bedding from both bedrooms. The bedding tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158221 - 2017-09-21
to Stewart’s home where they arrested Stewart and recovered bedding from both bedrooms. The bedding tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158221 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Towanka S. King
-of-the-circumstances test). “We accord great deference to the warrant-issuing [officer]’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19811 - 2017-09-21
-of-the-circumstances test). “We accord great deference to the warrant-issuing [officer]’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19811 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“manifest injustice” test applies, State v. Negrete, 2012 WI 92, ¶16, 343 Wis. 2d 1, 819 N.W.2d 749
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386047 - 2021-07-14
“manifest injustice” test applies, State v. Negrete, 2012 WI 92, ¶16, 343 Wis. 2d 1, 819 N.W.2d 749
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386047 - 2021-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
responses to her testing instruments reflected malingering. In sum, the record supports the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38808 - 2009-08-03
responses to her testing instruments reflected malingering. In sum, the record supports the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38808 - 2009-08-03
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances rather than providing “discrete elements of a more rigid test.” Id. Thus, if an informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31892 - 2008-02-20
of the circumstances rather than providing “discrete elements of a more rigid test.” Id. Thus, if an informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31892 - 2008-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
several of the factors that are part of the test for extraordinary circumstances. Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978605 - 2025-07-03
several of the factors that are part of the test for extraordinary circumstances. Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978605 - 2025-07-03