Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26271 - 26280 of 64076 for records/1000.
Search results 26271 - 26280 of 64076 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Earl Parks
forth in the record, the State did not know if Parks would accept its offer until the day before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13690 - 2014-09-15
forth in the record, the State did not know if Parks would accept its offer until the day before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13690 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
practitioner opinions” and “drew unreasonable inferences from [Zwiefelhofer’s] medical records.” Dr. Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60216 - 2011-02-22
practitioner opinions” and “drew unreasonable inferences from [Zwiefelhofer’s] medical records.” Dr. Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60216 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
Terence J. Bilgo v. Don Reineking
of the house. There is simply nothing in the record, other than Bilgo’s conclusory allegations, to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6479 - 2017-09-19
of the house. There is simply nothing in the record, other than Bilgo’s conclusory allegations, to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6479 - 2017-09-19
State v. Roger J. Dotz
a sentence reduction. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9610 - 2005-03-31
a sentence reduction. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9610 - 2005-03-31
County of Waukesha v. Ydbi Islami
. Stat. § 805.17(2). We will search the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3908 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 805.17(2). We will search the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3908 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude the untimely answer should not be imputed to Armbrust. First, nothing in the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32778 - 2008-05-21
conclude the untimely answer should not be imputed to Armbrust. First, nothing in the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32778 - 2008-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the grounds that the appeal is frivolous. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113119 - 2017-09-21
on the grounds that the appeal is frivolous. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113119 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no- merit report, response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478456 - 2022-02-03
response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no- merit report, response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478456 - 2022-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the report, and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246409 - 2019-09-11
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the report, and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246409 - 2019-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not in Ayala’s medical records. Furthermore, the court noted that even if that assumption were correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215124 - 2018-07-03
was not in Ayala’s medical records. Furthermore, the court noted that even if that assumption were correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215124 - 2018-07-03