Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26271 - 26280 of 58511 for speedy trial.

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
, Rochelle appeared with her attorney and requested a jury trial. ¶4 On August 7, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3704 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Industry to Industry, Inc. v. Hillsman Modular Molding, Inc.
from a nonfinal order of the trial court awarding partial summary judgment to Hillsman Modular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2913 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on the grounds that Powell failed to allege ineffective assistance of trial counsel in his first postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061842 - 2026-01-14

COURT OF APPEALS
the verdict was perverse and damages were inadequate. She also requests a new trial in the interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79932 - 2012-03-26

[PDF] Brown County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
) the trial court improperly exercised its discretion because it “concluded in a cursory fashion” the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7375 - 2017-09-20

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
, Rochelle appeared with her attorney and requested a jury trial. ¶4 On August 7, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3705 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bruce A. Rumage
]/oral” by use of force. The evidence adduced at trial indicated that Rumage attacked the victim in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12093 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
effective assistance from his trial counsel, and whether he should receive a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33786 - 2008-08-20

[PDF] State v. Henry Bowles
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in excluding evidence that, he argues, would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14877 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Theodore Frostman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
that it is entitled to a new trial due to improper jury instructions, erroneous admission of evidence regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8247 - 2017-09-19