Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26271 - 26280 of 38489 for t's.
Search results 26271 - 26280 of 38489 for t's.
State v. Henry J. Brookshire
, the testimony of both Brookshire and trial counsel clearly supports the trial court's conclusion that “[t]here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
, the testimony of both Brookshire and trial counsel clearly supports the trial court's conclusion that “[t]here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
Peter L. Walls v. Pamela A. Walls
was that Peter would take $37,000 and Pam would take $30,000 of the sale proceeds and that “[t]hey'll each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10316 - 2005-03-31
was that Peter would take $37,000 and Pam would take $30,000 of the sale proceeds and that “[t]hey'll each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10316 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
system covers small claims actions with the following: “[t]he requirements of this section shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782919 - 2024-04-02
system covers small claims actions with the following: “[t]he requirements of this section shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782919 - 2024-04-02
State v. Michael L. Morris
did not rely on that report. While Morris maintains that “[t]he sentencing court’s remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3614 - 2005-03-31
did not rely on that report. While Morris maintains that “[t]he sentencing court’s remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3614 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven E. Mariades v. Marquette County
, that [t]his matter was not submitted in the form of a summary judgment motion with opposing papers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13354 - 2017-09-21
, that [t]his matter was not submitted in the form of a summary judgment motion with opposing papers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13354 - 2017-09-21
State v. David William Newbury
a justifiable basis for imposing sentence. In imposing sentence, the court indicated that it considered: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31
a justifiable basis for imposing sentence. In imposing sentence, the court indicated that it considered: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patrick McDonough v. Alan J. Muetzelburg
684 (1984). “[I]t is always the value to the owner, to the injured party, that is the measure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14297 - 2014-09-15
684 (1984). “[I]t is always the value to the owner, to the injured party, that is the measure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14297 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
or “[t]he judge may choose to summarize the testimony for the jury in lieu of having it read.” Kohlhoff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
or “[t]he judge may choose to summarize the testimony for the jury in lieu of having it read.” Kohlhoff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 14, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532006 - 2022-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 14, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532006 - 2022-06-14
[PDF]
State v. Bardley R. Cummings
is impaired by alcohol consumption.” He says: [I]t was the obligation of the State, in order to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11974 - 2017-09-21
is impaired by alcohol consumption.” He says: [I]t was the obligation of the State, in order to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11974 - 2017-09-21