Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26281 - 26290 of 69380 for as he.

[PDF] State v. Charles W. Mark
Constitution,3 because he claims that all four statements were both compelled and incriminating, as well
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25744 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sisakhone S. Douangmala
on the ground that he did not understand the risk of deportation that arose from his pleas. In an earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3352 - 2005-03-31

State v. Shafiq K. Imani
PER CURIAM. Shafiq Imani appeals a judgment of conviction on several felony counts. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5179 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - State ex rel. Drankovich v. Murphy
on the grounds that he had been tried and convicted without a lawyer and had not been made aware that he
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases17.pdf - 2009-11-17

[PDF] NOTICE
Obriecht has filed. This is the second habeas proceeding in which he has litigated claims of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28359 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of second-degree reckless homicide as a party to a crime in 2007. By appointed appellate counsel, he moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96181 - 2013-05-06

State v. Algen M. Lamon
and as a repeat offender. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5909 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Shafiq K. Imani
of conviction on several felony counts. He argues that the trial court erred by admitting certain evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5179 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Talib Amin Akbar v. Gary R. McCaughtry
denying relief. Akbar alleges that, upon reading the presentence report, he discovered that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11364 - 2017-09-19

State v. Dwayne O. Jackson
appeals an order denying his motion for resentencing. He argues that the trial court unreasonably drew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3480 - 2005-03-31