Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26281 - 26290 of 57317 for id.
Search results 26281 - 26290 of 57317 for id.
State v. Vonnie D. Darby
court imposed consecutive sentences totaling seven and one-half years. Id. Darby appealed, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5418 - 2005-03-31
court imposed consecutive sentences totaling seven and one-half years. Id. Darby appealed, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5418 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jayson D. Edwards v. Gary R. McCaughtry
reasonably make the order or determination in question. Id. “The facts found by the committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3797 - 2017-09-20
reasonably make the order or determination in question. Id. “The facts found by the committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3797 - 2017-09-20
Douglas H. Mellum v. Catherine Ann Mellum
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21432 - 2006-02-15
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21432 - 2006-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of plaintiff’s explanation for the need to dismiss. Id. (quoted source omitted). We will affirm a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82887 - 2012-05-29
of plaintiff’s explanation for the need to dismiss. Id. (quoted source omitted). We will affirm a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82887 - 2012-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
using a two-step standard of review. Id. We defer to the trial court’s factual determinations unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56705 - 2010-11-16
using a two-step standard of review. Id. We defer to the trial court’s factual determinations unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56705 - 2010-11-16
State v. William McCall
through the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror. Id. at 717 ¶27. We uphold a trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2167 - 2005-03-31
through the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror. Id. at 717 ¶27. We uphold a trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2167 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not have been committed by the court if the matter had been brought to [its] attention[.]” Id. at 213–214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61891 - 2011-03-28
not have been committed by the court if the matter had been brought to [its] attention[.]” Id. at 213–214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61891 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 664, 277 N.W.2d 778 (1979). No. 2009AP2840-FT 5 matter jurisdiction. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49797 - 2014-09-15
, 664, 277 N.W.2d 778 (1979). No. 2009AP2840-FT 5 matter jurisdiction. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49797 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
. See id. Whether Vines’ prior convictions were proved as required by § 973.12(1) presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21
. See id. Whether Vines’ prior convictions were proved as required by § 973.12(1) presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
brought to [its] attention[.]” Id. at 213–214, 290 N.W.2d at 688. More succinctly, it is a “writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61891 - 2014-09-15
brought to [its] attention[.]” Id. at 213–214, 290 N.W.2d at 688. More succinctly, it is a “writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61891 - 2014-09-15