Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26281 - 26290 of 59339 for quit claim deed.
Search results 26281 - 26290 of 59339 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
claims he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76558 - 2012-01-17
claims he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76558 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there would be arguable merit to a claim that Langiewicz’s no-contest plea was not entered knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088389 - 2026-03-10
there would be arguable merit to a claim that Langiewicz’s no-contest plea was not entered knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088389 - 2026-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of property seized. (1) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80626 - 2014-09-15
of property seized. (1) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80626 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
William J. Steele, Jr. v. Pacesetter Motor Cars, Inc.
the $14,281.98 he claimed. We conclude that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in ruling: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6248 - 2017-09-19
the $14,281.98 he claimed. We conclude that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in ruling: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6248 - 2017-09-19
State v. Khue Xiong
the State from referring to Xiong by his nickname, “Shotgun.” Xiong claims that the repeated references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19888 - 2005-10-10
the State from referring to Xiong by his nickname, “Shotgun.” Xiong claims that the repeated references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19888 - 2005-10-10
City of Milwaukee v. Sammie L. Glass
that the plaintiff failed to comply with the notice of claim provisions of Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1)(b).[3] ¶9
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17547 - 2005-03-31
that the plaintiff failed to comply with the notice of claim provisions of Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1)(b).[3] ¶9
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17547 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction for armed robbery and false imprisonment, each as party to the crime. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76728 - 2014-09-15
of conviction for armed robbery and false imprisonment, each as party to the crime. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76728 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Roger W. Alswager v. Roundy's Inc.
of Alswager’s claims, but permitted the fourth claim, defamation, to proceed. ¶4 In late December 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6801 - 2017-09-20
of Alswager’s claims, but permitted the fourth claim, defamation, to proceed. ¶4 In late December 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6801 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Robertson
a hearing, No. 00-0528-CR 4 concluding that Robertson “failed to set forth a viable claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2309 - 2017-09-19
a hearing, No. 00-0528-CR 4 concluding that Robertson “failed to set forth a viable claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2309 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
imposed shorter confinement” by weighing the relevant factors differently, and he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60992 - 2014-09-15
imposed shorter confinement” by weighing the relevant factors differently, and he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60992 - 2014-09-15