Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26281 - 26290 of 59782 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 26281 - 26290 of 59782 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Peter J. Long
was required under Wis. Stat. § 802.06(2)(a)10, which allows for a motion to claim as a defense “[a]nother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4622 - 2005-03-31
was required under Wis. Stat. § 802.06(2)(a)10, which allows for a motion to claim as a defense “[a]nother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4622 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Gulley
sentence credit. He claims the trial court improperly denied him credit for time he spent in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15238 - 2005-03-31
sentence credit. He claims the trial court improperly denied him credit for time he spent in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
he is entitled to a hearing on his claim that he received ineffective assistance from trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31014 - 2014-09-15
he is entitled to a hearing on his claim that he received ineffective assistance from trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31014 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reject both. The State argues that Boyles forfeited his ineffective assistance claim against his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
reject both. The State argues that Boyles forfeited his ineffective assistance claim against his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
[PDF]
Dusan Jankovic v. Roger P. Petersen
the elements necessary to sustain their claim to a prescriptive easement over the east 2.9 feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10034 - 2017-09-19
the elements necessary to sustain their claim to a prescriptive easement over the east 2.9 feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10034 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a conviction on two drug charges. The issue is whether he is entitled to a hearing on his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31014 - 2007-11-28
a conviction on two drug charges. The issue is whether he is entitled to a hearing on his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31014 - 2007-11-28
J.P. Cullen & Sons, Inc. v. Daul Industries, Inc.
its motion for summary judgment on a promissory estoppel claim made against it by J.P. Cullen & Sons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6120 - 2005-03-31
its motion for summary judgment on a promissory estoppel claim made against it by J.P. Cullen & Sons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) dismissing Barry’s claim that Barry’s former employer unreasonably refused to rehire her following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184128 - 2017-09-21
) dismissing Barry’s claim that Barry’s former employer unreasonably refused to rehire her following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184128 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Allen
motion to dismiss which is based on Allen’s claim that he was denied a speedy trial. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5814 - 2017-09-19
motion to dismiss which is based on Allen’s claim that he was denied a speedy trial. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5814 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rodger A. Dierks
the maximum sentence of 90 days incarceration on each count, to be served consecutively. He claims the total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9415 - 2005-03-31
the maximum sentence of 90 days incarceration on each count, to be served consecutively. He claims the total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9415 - 2005-03-31