Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26281 - 26290 of 84085 for simple case search.
Search results 26281 - 26290 of 84085 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 Carradine’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821650 - 2024-07-03
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 Carradine’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821650 - 2024-07-03
[PDF]
First Federal Savings Bank LaCrosse-Madison v. Patricia A. Vetterkind
relief the judgment can afford is replevin. This court agrees and, accordingly, remands the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10572 - 2017-09-20
relief the judgment can afford is replevin. This court agrees and, accordingly, remands the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10572 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
2007 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32394 - 2014-09-15
2007 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32394 - 2014-09-15
State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
criminal court judges regarding the role of medical technicians as witnesses in OWI cases. As noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14215 - 2005-03-31
criminal court judges regarding the role of medical technicians as witnesses in OWI cases. As noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14215 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102718 - 2026-04-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102718 - 2026-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment in favor of Guardian Pipeline, LLC. This is one of several cases brought by landowners against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
a judgment in favor of Guardian Pipeline, LLC. This is one of several cases brought by landowners against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP1694-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CT184
if the case were retried, and the court’s conclusion that “equity would demand that someone … pay
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29942 - 2014-09-15
if the case were retried, and the court’s conclusion that “equity would demand that someone … pay
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29942 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190555 - 2017-09-21
conclude that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190555 - 2017-09-21
Certification
if the case were retried, and the court’s conclusion that “equity would demand that someone … pay
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29942 - 2007-08-08
if the case were retried, and the court’s conclusion that “equity would demand that someone … pay
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29942 - 2007-08-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102718 - 2026-04-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102718 - 2026-04-15