Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2631 - 2640 of 3970 for davie.
Search results 2631 - 2640 of 3970 for davie.
Charles A. Mikrut v. State
as implying a judgment and sentence of the court upon a verdict or confession of guilt.” Davis v. State, 134
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11447 - 2005-03-31
as implying a judgment and sentence of the court upon a verdict or confession of guilt.” Davis v. State, 134
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 182
of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C., Green Bay. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the intervening defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42965 - 2014-09-15
of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C., Green Bay. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the intervening defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42965 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a contemporaneous objection at trial to preserve an issue for appellate review. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110486 - 2014-04-21
a contemporaneous objection at trial to preserve an issue for appellate review. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110486 - 2014-04-21
[PDF]
John Doe 67A v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
159, 163 (1984) (court of appeals bound by supreme court precedent); cf. Hutto v. Davis, 454 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6526 - 2017-09-19
159, 163 (1984) (court of appeals bound by supreme court precedent); cf. Hutto v. Davis, 454 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6526 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35108 - 2014-09-15
). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513, 519, 545 N.W.2d 244, 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35108 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” Id., ¶18 (quoting Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822 (2006)). Statements are “‘testimonial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
.’” Id., ¶18 (quoting Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822 (2006)). Statements are “‘testimonial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 20
-respondents, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Donald K. Schott, Jeffrey O. Davis, Valerie L. Bailey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46376 - 2014-09-15
-respondents, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Donald K. Schott, Jeffrey O. Davis, Valerie L. Bailey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46376 - 2014-09-15
State v. James L. Holloway
to the defendant. State v. Davis, 144 Wis.2d 852, 855, 425 N.W.2d 411, 412 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8115 - 2005-03-31
to the defendant. State v. Davis, 144 Wis.2d 852, 855, 425 N.W.2d 411, 412 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8115 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 98
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36652 - 2009-07-28
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36652 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398946 - 2021-07-28
., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398946 - 2021-07-28