Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26301 - 26310 of 56214 for n y c.

[PDF] Microsoft Word - Table2
-16-2021 Affirmed 2020AP001265 Jerod C. Hansen v. Mark A. Klein 07-27-2021 Affirmed
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482814 - 2022-02-08

[PDF] FA-604A;Stipulation to Change: Custody/Physical Placement/Support/Maintenance/Arrears
Information In C, enter number of children under 18, and under 19 and pursuing a course of education
/formdisplay/FA-604A.pdf?formNumber=FA-604A&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2023-01-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or until the child attains the age of 18 years. (c) That, if appointed, it is likely that the person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72894 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Larry R. W. v. Alan F. S.
, or other No. 94-1314 No. 94-1315 No. 94-1316 -5- Title 28 U.S.C. § 1738A(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7887 - 2017-09-19

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leo Barron Hicks
:1.15(a),[1] SCR 20:5.1(c)(2),[2] and SCR 20:1.15(d).[3] Attorney Hicks filed an answer, affirmative
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16662 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard G. Giese
to §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 346.65(2)(c), Stats. Count two charged him with OMVWI with 0.08 grams or more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31

Corinne L. v. Douglas P.
the taxpayer is entitled to an exemption for the taxable year under section 151(c) of the federal internal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Corinne L. v. Douglas P.
to an exemption for the taxable year under section 151(c) of the federal internal revenue code.” Section 151(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2428 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with a mandatory minimum twenty-five-year term of initial confinement to a class C felony with no mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122664 - 2014-09-24

Joseph Jackson v.
disobedience of an obligation under the rules of that court, in violation of SCR 20:3.4(c).[5] ¶9 A second
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17387 - 2005-03-31