Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26301 - 26310 of 63323 for records.
Search results 26301 - 26310 of 63323 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we No. 2020AP855-CR 2 conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379250 - 2021-06-23
of the briefs and record, we No. 2020AP855-CR 2 conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379250 - 2021-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460601 - 2021-12-07
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460601 - 2021-12-07
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140013 - 2015-04-21
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140013 - 2015-04-21
[PDF]
Ronald S. Schilling v. Patricia Goodrich
because the record does not show that Schilling asked the judge to recuse himself or otherwise raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3048 - 2017-09-19
because the record does not show that Schilling asked the judge to recuse himself or otherwise raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3048 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven K. Pinney
. 1 There is some confusion in the record as to whether police were informed that Pinney was armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9995 - 2017-09-19
. 1 There is some confusion in the record as to whether police were informed that Pinney was armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9995 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responded. 1 Upon this court’s review of the record, no arguable issue of merit appears and we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132250 - 2017-09-21
responded. 1 Upon this court’s review of the record, no arguable issue of merit appears and we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132250 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a response. Counsel then filed a supplemental no-merit report. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490009 - 2022-03-09
filed a response. Counsel then filed a supplemental no-merit report. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490009 - 2022-03-09
State v. Donald T. Fravert
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13983 - 2005-03-31
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13983 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald T. Fravert
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13984 - 2005-03-31
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13984 - 2005-03-31
Human Services Center v. Francis D. Bocek
the record shows Bocek’s emergency detention was illegal or invalid, it is allowed to recover its costs from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15253 - 2005-03-31
the record shows Bocek’s emergency detention was illegal or invalid, it is allowed to recover its costs from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15253 - 2005-03-31