Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26301 - 26310 of 58546 for speedy trial.

Crossmark, Inc. v. Nick DeGeorge
Marketing Services, Inc., in an action brought against them by Crossmark, Inc. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4993 - 2005-09-30

[PDF] Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
. Alexander L. Jacobus appeals from an order in which the trial court denied his petition for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8266 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ronald Roy Peterson
claims that the trial court wrongly denied his motion to suppress the evidence seized during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8876 - 2017-09-19

State v. Henry Bowles
. § 943.20(1)(b) (1997-98).[1] He asserts that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14877 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
pled guilty to that charge No. 2020AP1043-CR 2 after the trial court denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382135 - 2021-06-29

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
, Rochelle appeared with her attorney and requested a jury trial. ¶4 On August 7, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3705 - 2012-09-24

Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
Education Milwaukee Municipal Judge Derek Mosley, right, speaks during a mock trial exercise
/news/thirdbranch/mar22/judedmuni.htm - 2026-03-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, Ziegler focuses only on the trial court’s denial of his motion to compel arbitration, and we therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622126 - 2023-02-15

[PDF] State v. Henry Bowles
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in excluding evidence that, he argues, would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14877 - 2017-09-21

Industry to Industry, Inc. v. Hillsman Modular Molding, Inc.
to Industry, Inc., appeals from a nonfinal order of the trial court awarding partial summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2913 - 2005-03-31