Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26311 - 26320 of 29823 for des.

Nesbitt Farms, LLC v. City of Madison
We review the granting of a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5576 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ozga Enterprises, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
dispositive. MARQUETTE COUNTY Our review of a grant of summary judgment is de novo and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7805 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 261
court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but determine de novo whether the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27184 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial, however, are questions of law we decide de novo. Id. No. 2010AP2946
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65601 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Palisades Collection LLC v. Kalal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100808 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 218
statement, she indicates that the appropriate standard of review is de novo without providing any citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30160 - 2014-09-15

Rita Powell v. Milwaukee Area Technical College District Board
are obligated to apply the same standard as the trial court. See id. Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13153 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶5. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52592 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Albert Trostel & Sons Company v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
court’s decision in Hills. II. DISCUSSION Our standard of review of summary judgments is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9146 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.” Id., ¶14. This is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125349 - 2017-09-21