Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26311 - 26320 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 26311 - 26320 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit reports and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450623 - 2021-11-09
of the no-merit reports and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450623 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
. It found nothing in the record supporting Woods’s assertion that he was incompetent at any time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31049 - 2014-09-15
. It found nothing in the record supporting Woods’s assertion that he was incompetent at any time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163905 - 2017-09-21
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the original offense, the [defendant’s] institutional conduct record, as well as the amount of incarceration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30088 - 2014-09-15
of the original offense, the [defendant’s] institutional conduct record, as well as the amount of incarceration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30088 - 2014-09-15
State v. Levi Booth
, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20701 - 2005-12-19
, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20701 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an independent review of the record, the no-merit report, and Coleman’s response, we affirmed. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104304 - 2017-09-21
an independent review of the record, the no-merit report, and Coleman’s response, we affirmed. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104304 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
it was at a “disadvantage” because it had not had time, and needed time, to review Williams’ criminal record for conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79500 - 2012-03-12
it was at a “disadvantage” because it had not had time, and needed time, to review Williams’ criminal record for conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79500 - 2012-03-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222303 - 2018-10-16
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222303 - 2018-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-NM 2019AP873-NM 2 an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443292 - 2021-10-19
-NM 2019AP873-NM 2 an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443292 - 2021-10-19
State v. Christopher Mack
considered Mack’s character, his extensive record as a juvenile and his incarceration and treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13112 - 2005-03-31
considered Mack’s character, his extensive record as a juvenile and his incarceration and treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13112 - 2005-03-31