Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26331 - 26340 of 38468 for t's.
Search results 26331 - 26340 of 38468 for t's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there’s no parking allowed.” Indeed, “[t]he authority of police to seize and remove from the streets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871898 - 2024-11-06
there’s no parking allowed.” Indeed, “[t]he authority of police to seize and remove from the streets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871898 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 5, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236533 - 2019-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 5, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236533 - 2019-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the pulse codes. …. [T]he best way, my view Counsel, is not just talking about paper licenses and paper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159357 - 2017-09-21
the pulse codes. …. [T]he best way, my view Counsel, is not just talking about paper licenses and paper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159357 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.) Postconviction/appellate counsel concludes that “[t]he police procedure which led to Ortiz’s in-court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180205 - 2017-09-21
.) Postconviction/appellate counsel concludes that “[t]he police procedure which led to Ortiz’s in-court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180205 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Betty L. Blue v. Ford Motor Company
, Curry came very close to giving such an opinion when he testified that “[t]here was not Nos. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12926 - 2017-09-21
, Curry came very close to giving such an opinion when he testified that “[t]here was not Nos. 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12926 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 4, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 4, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
check after a lawful contact is but a momentary occurrence” where “[t]he intrusion is minimal at best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147971 - 2015-09-02
check after a lawful contact is but a momentary occurrence” where “[t]he intrusion is minimal at best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147971 - 2015-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
and adversely affected his defense. He contends that “[t]he jury could well have found the state witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2010-05-24
and adversely affected his defense. He contends that “[t]he jury could well have found the state witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2010-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
and not physically capable of possession on that day. “[T]he term ‘possession’ includes both actual and constructive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45608 - 2010-01-12
and not physically capable of possession on that day. “[T]he term ‘possession’ includes both actual and constructive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45608 - 2010-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
was loud enough to disturb the neighbors, the court pointed out that, in fact, “[t]he officer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54126 - 2010-09-07
was loud enough to disturb the neighbors, the court pointed out that, in fact, “[t]he officer testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54126 - 2010-09-07