Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26341 - 26350 of 61886 for does.
Search results 26341 - 26350 of 61886 for does.
State v. Larry E. Thomas
does not constitute an erroneous exercise of sentencing discretion. ¶15 Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7117 - 2005-03-31
does not constitute an erroneous exercise of sentencing discretion. ¶15 Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7117 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
does exactly what Cascade Mountain proscribes; it converts a nonfinal, nonappealable order into a final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28675 - 2007-07-11
does exactly what Cascade Mountain proscribes; it converts a nonfinal, nonappealable order into a final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28675 - 2007-07-11
State v. Paul D. Martin
of the evidence, as evinced by its conclusion that his asthma “does not necessarily mean he could not produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5773 - 2005-03-31
of the evidence, as evinced by its conclusion that his asthma “does not necessarily mean he could not produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5773 - 2005-03-31
State v. John W. Moore
of conduct which has this effect does not abridge constitutional liberty.” Issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
of conduct which has this effect does not abridge constitutional liberty.” Issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14546 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the perfunctory nature of the plea colloquy does not prove that he understood the elements of the charges to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44849 - 2009-12-21
that the perfunctory nature of the plea colloquy does not prove that he understood the elements of the charges to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44849 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
related to sentencing, as does this appeal.1 At sentencing, the State asked the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97212 - 2014-09-15
related to sentencing, as does this appeal.1 At sentencing, the State asked the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97212 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
were psychotropic, newly prescribed, or in a new dose, the postconviction motion does not allege any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116663 - 2017-09-21
were psychotropic, newly prescribed, or in a new dose, the postconviction motion does not allege any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116663 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jackie C.
the alternative of attempting to rebut the presumption. (Citations omitted.) ¶5 On appeal, Jackie C. does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5340 - 2017-09-19
the alternative of attempting to rebut the presumption. (Citations omitted.) ¶5 On appeal, Jackie C. does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5340 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Hoeft
is also related to the third factor―Hoeft’s assertion of his speedy trial right. A defendant does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19759 - 2017-09-21
is also related to the third factor―Hoeft’s assertion of his speedy trial right. A defendant does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19759 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. The doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply where parties have entered into an express or implied contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10
. The doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply where parties have entered into an express or implied contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10