Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26351 - 26360 of 30177 for de.
Search results 26351 - 26360 of 30177 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether a deprivation of a constitutional right has occurred are questions of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89570 - 2012-11-26
and whether a deprivation of a constitutional right has occurred are questions of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89570 - 2012-11-26
Tri-Tech Corporation of America v. Americomp Services, Inc.
involves statutory construction and is a question of law that we review de novo. Morris v. Juneau County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3311 - 2005-03-31
involves statutory construction and is a question of law that we review de novo. Morris v. Juneau County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3311 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id., ¶9. “If the motion raises such facts, the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125349 - 2014-10-27
. This is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id., ¶9. “If the motion raises such facts, the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125349 - 2014-10-27
State v. Melvin R. Tucker
N.W.2d 883, 885 (1985). Whether charges are multiplicitous is an issue subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7863 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 883, 885 (1985). Whether charges are multiplicitous is an issue subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7863 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶19 A criminal defendant is guaranteed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251705 - 2019-12-23
, is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶19 A criminal defendant is guaranteed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251705 - 2019-12-23
John W. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel Inc.
court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v. Village of Egg Harbor, 179 Wis.2d 565, 568, 508
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8948 - 2005-03-31
court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v. Village of Egg Harbor, 179 Wis.2d 565, 568, 508
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8948 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adverse possession is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶19 Generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982819 - 2025-07-15
adverse possession is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶19 Generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982819 - 2025-07-15
Philip I. Warren v. David H. Schwarz
of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11325 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11325 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
of the divorce judgment, we apply a de novo standard. Id. As to the ultimate decision whether to grant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16581 - 2017-09-21
of the divorce judgment, we apply a de novo standard. Id. As to the ultimate decision whether to grant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16581 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶11 It is well established that we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100808 - 2013-08-14
. DISCUSSION ¶11 It is well established that we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100808 - 2013-08-14