Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26351 - 26360 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 26351 - 26360 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Arch L. H.
minimus.” Id. at 541-42, 370 N.W.2d at 231. The test is “whether there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11256 - 2017-09-19
minimus.” Id. at 541-42, 370 N.W.2d at 231. The test is “whether there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11256 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The five-prong Pulizzano2 test requires a defendant to show: (1) that the prior acts clearly occurred; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76501 - 2014-09-15
). The five-prong Pulizzano2 test requires a defendant to show: (1) that the prior acts clearly occurred; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76501 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
We employ a common sense test to determine whether an investigative traffic stop was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41714 - 2009-09-30
We employ a common sense test to determine whether an investigative traffic stop was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41714 - 2009-09-30
State v. Pharoah Weaver
), Stats. The test for whether an error was harmless is whether there is no reasonable possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8152 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. The test for whether an error was harmless is whether there is no reasonable possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8152 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
not provide bad advice and that Sveum is procedurally barred from raising the witness claim. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32944 - 2014-09-15
not provide bad advice and that Sveum is procedurally barred from raising the witness claim. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. (citation omitted). Under that test, it must be demonstrated that the citizen “yield[ed] to th[e] show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210432 - 2018-04-03
. (citation omitted). Under that test, it must be demonstrated that the citizen “yield[ed] to th[e] show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210432 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
State v. Tony B. Oliver
for the prejudice prong of the test is whether the alleged deficiency so undermined the proper functioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5290 - 2017-09-19
for the prejudice prong of the test is whether the alleged deficiency so undermined the proper functioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5290 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). The test is an objective test that requires an examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225486 - 2018-10-30
omitted). The test is an objective test that requires an examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225486 - 2018-10-30
State v. Virtis A.
” in the preceding two years, and that he tested positive for opiates and cocaine even after the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6666 - 2005-03-31
” in the preceding two years, and that he tested positive for opiates and cocaine even after the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6666 - 2005-03-31