Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26361 - 26370 of 28869 for W.
Search results 26361 - 26370 of 28869 for W.
WI App 50 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2008 Complete Title of...
-respondent, Michael Nofzinger, the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert W. Dean of Henessy & Roach, P.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79860 - 2012-04-24
-respondent, Michael Nofzinger, the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert W. Dean of Henessy & Roach, P.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79860 - 2012-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
to the question “[W]hat did you do then?” Pope testified: In…December, when we—after meeting with mom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40102 - 2009-08-26
to the question “[W]hat did you do then?” Pope testified: In…December, when we—after meeting with mom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40102 - 2009-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the sufficiency of the affidavit rests on his assertion that applications for “[w]arrants to search for child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247234 - 2019-09-24
to the sufficiency of the affidavit rests on his assertion that applications for “[w]arrants to search for child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247234 - 2019-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. Kenosha Cnty. DHS v. Jodie W., 2006 WI 93, ¶25, 293 Wis. 2d 530, 716 N.W.2d 845. ¶17 When assessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115580 - 2014-06-30
. Kenosha Cnty. DHS v. Jodie W., 2006 WI 93, ¶25, 293 Wis. 2d 530, 716 N.W.2d 845. ¶17 When assessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115580 - 2014-06-30
State v. Frederick Robertson
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: Steven w. weinke, Judge. Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5412 - 2005-03-31
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: Steven w. weinke, Judge. Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5412 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricardo Ruiz
. Not Participating: ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner the cause was argued by Stephen W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17317 - 2005-03-31
. Not Participating: ATTORNEYS: For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner the cause was argued by Stephen W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17317 - 2005-03-31
Carol Keip v. James Nicewander
County: FREDERIC W. FLEISHAUER, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2791 - 2005-03-31
County: FREDERIC W. FLEISHAUER, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2791 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had a viable suppression motion, and then answered “yes,” when asked if he “[w]ould … have gone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352008 - 2021-04-01
had a viable suppression motion, and then answered “yes,” when asked if he “[w]ould … have gone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352008 - 2021-04-01
[PDF]
State v. Dennis E. Scott
N.W.2d 107 (Ct. App. 1986) (“[W]hile a witness may be cross-examined regarding prior convictions, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14712 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 107 (Ct. App. 1986) (“[W]hile a witness may be cross-examined regarding prior convictions, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14712 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Stynes
of proof contemplated under § 973.12(1), Stats. . . . [W]e again in this case urge the adoption
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16620 - 2017-09-21
of proof contemplated under § 973.12(1), Stats. . . . [W]e again in this case urge the adoption
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16620 - 2017-09-21