Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26371 - 26380 of 29828 for des.
Search results 26371 - 26380 of 29828 for des.
John W. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc.
court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v. Village of Egg Harbor, 179 Wis.2d 565, 568, 508
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9322 - 2005-03-31
court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v. Village of Egg Harbor, 179 Wis.2d 565, 568, 508
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9322 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, but we review de novo No. 2020AP887-CR 6 whether counsel’s conduct constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481891 - 2022-02-09
erroneous, but we review de novo No. 2020AP887-CR 6 whether counsel’s conduct constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481891 - 2022-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d 219, 236, 548 N.W.2d 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614483 - 2023-01-25
was prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d 219, 236, 548 N.W.2d 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614483 - 2023-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶21. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181180 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶21. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 235
. ¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards and methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30458 - 2014-09-15
. ¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards and methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30458 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 141
contract. We review a trial court’s summary judgment determination de novo, applying the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33750 - 2014-09-15
contract. We review a trial court’s summary judgment determination de novo, applying the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33750 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
or apply legal authority in reviewing the trial court’s decision, our review is de novo. See State v. West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75830 - 2011-12-28
or apply legal authority in reviewing the trial court’s decision, our review is de novo. See State v. West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75830 - 2011-12-28
[PDF]
WI App 63
is a question of law that we review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013654 - 2025-11-20
is a question of law that we review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013654 - 2025-11-20
2009 WI App 130
interpretation and application, which are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See WIREdata, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39799 - 2009-12-14
interpretation and application, which are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See WIREdata, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39799 - 2009-12-14
John Trenhaile v. J.H. Findorff & Son, Inc.
court’s legal findings de novo. See Block v. Gomez, 201 Wis. 2d 795, 805, 549 N.W.2d 783, 787 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5834 - 2005-03-31
court’s legal findings de novo. See Block v. Gomez, 201 Wis. 2d 795, 805, 549 N.W.2d 783, 787 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5834 - 2005-03-31