Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26371 - 26380 of 57358 for id.
Search results 26371 - 26380 of 57358 for id.
Douglas H. Mellum v. Catherine Ann Mellum
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21432 - 2006-02-15
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21432 - 2006-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration.” Id. We thus compare the issues raised in the reconsideration motion with the issues disposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49478 - 2010-05-03
for reconsideration.” Id. We thus compare the issues raised in the reconsideration motion with the issues disposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49478 - 2010-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
standard is whether there are any material facts in dispute that entitle the opposing party to a trial. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
standard is whether there are any material facts in dispute that entitle the opposing party to a trial. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
exists to terminate a parent’s rights. Id., ¶26. If a ground is established, the parent is found unfit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92907 - 2013-02-18
exists to terminate a parent’s rights. Id., ¶26. If a ground is established, the parent is found unfit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92907 - 2013-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
most favorably to the verdict. Id. at 504. Thus, we must search the record to support the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47319 - 2010-03-02
most favorably to the verdict. Id. at 504. Thus, we must search the record to support the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47319 - 2010-03-02
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing. See id. at 309-10 (citation omitted). An ineffectiveness claim fails without proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31014 - 2007-11-28
a hearing. See id. at 309-10 (citation omitted). An ineffectiveness claim fails without proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31014 - 2007-11-28
State v. Anthony A. Suslick
” but contemplates the showing of some adequate reason for the defendant’s change of heart. Id. at 583. “The reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2836 - 2005-03-31
” but contemplates the showing of some adequate reason for the defendant’s change of heart. Id. at 583. “The reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2836 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
’ with substantial reasons not to extend probation to compel payment of restitution.” Id. at 295. ¶9 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45888 - 2014-09-15
’ with substantial reasons not to extend probation to compel payment of restitution.” Id. at 295. ¶9 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2012AP836 4 that the Board reasonably could have reached the determination it did. Id., ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92670 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP836 4 that the Board reasonably could have reached the determination it did. Id., ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92670 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William C. Rosenberg
the enhanced sentence proceeding.” Id. ¶4 Rosenberg did not assert in the trial court, and does not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2764 - 2017-09-19
the enhanced sentence proceeding.” Id. ¶4 Rosenberg did not assert in the trial court, and does not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2764 - 2017-09-19