Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26371 - 26380 of 63529 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief.’” Id. at 309-11 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135542 - 2015-02-23

COURT OF APPEALS
it was a public record or report under Wis. Stat. § 908.03(8) (2009-10).[3] The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85724 - 2012-08-07

[PDF] State v. Rakhoda Amani Beni
emotionally charged situation such as this. Those are my concerns. I wanted to make a record. I spoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18445 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Rakhoda Amani Beni
emotionally charged situation such as this. Those are my concerns. I wanted to make a record. I spoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18449 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ronny Eaton v. City of New Berlin
in this record to establish that $16,000.” While noting that the $16,000 represented the cost to re-establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6340 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John Lee Doll
, the record demonstrates that the trial court’s action constituted harmless error. ¶4 Unless a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16326 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Thomas
of a trial court. See id. If this court determines from the record that the trial court’s reasoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12743 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Steven R. Calhoun
was not admissible as a record of regularly conducted activity, pursuant to § 908.03(6), STATS.; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12199 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the vehicle.” Yet, Wilson points out that the record reflects no description by the anonymous caller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140075 - 2015-04-20

Dorene A. Goswitz v. Harlan R. Heinz
that the record supports the trial court’s finding of frivolousness and reasonable attorney fees. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14777 - 2005-03-31