Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶2 In Marinette County Case No. 2009CF131, Erickson was charged with burglary, felony theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109409 - 2017-09-21
¶2 In Marinette County Case No. 2009CF131, Erickson was charged with burglary, felony theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109409 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 219
2007 WI APP 219 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1475
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30318 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 219 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1475
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30318 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jerry J. Wintlend
2002 WI App 314 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0965-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5140 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 314 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0965-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5140 - 2005-03-31
WI 70 Supreme Court of Wisconsin No. 13-16A In the matter of the Petiti...
to clarify that this act only applies to civil cases. The definition of "Subpoena" was modified to make
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144218 - 2015-07-06
to clarify that this act only applies to civil cases. The definition of "Subpoena" was modified to make
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144218 - 2015-07-06
State v. Joseph R. Przybilla
). In that case, we said: The ultimate standard under the fourth amendment is the reasonableness of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9172 - 2005-03-31
). In that case, we said: The ultimate standard under the fourth amendment is the reasonableness of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Defender suggests that this case may be appropriate for a three-judge panel as well as publication. Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240516 - 2019-05-14
Defender suggests that this case may be appropriate for a three-judge panel as well as publication. Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240516 - 2019-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
investigation, the State charged Valoe in a new case with another count of conspiracy to commit theft by fraud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89383 - 2013-05-20
investigation, the State charged Valoe in a new case with another count of conspiracy to commit theft by fraud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89383 - 2013-05-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“has no effect on the circumstances of [his] case, some twenty-three years ago.” The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244317 - 2019-07-30
“has no effect on the circumstances of [his] case, some twenty-three years ago.” The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244317 - 2019-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
as a repeater. ¶4 Much of the State’s case hinged on Barr’s testimony. Barr recited a timeline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32290 - 2008-03-31
as a repeater. ¶4 Much of the State’s case hinged on Barr’s testimony. Barr recited a timeline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32290 - 2008-03-31
[PDF]
William J. Schimmels v. John A. Noordover
2006 WI APP 7 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP2794
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20710 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 7 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP2794
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20710 - 2017-09-21