Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 33987 for dismissed.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 33987 for dismissed.
State v. William J. Church
, Church moved to dismiss one of the two counts of child enticement as multiplicitous, but the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16569 - 2005-03-31
, Church moved to dismiss one of the two counts of child enticement as multiplicitous, but the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16569 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, the State moved to dismiss as moot both of Fitzgerald's cases, but we denied the motion. After oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242219 - 2019-08-13
, the State moved to dismiss as moot both of Fitzgerald's cases, but we denied the motion. After oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242219 - 2019-08-13
[PDF]
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
and entered judgment dismissing these complaints. ¶6 With respect to the Edwards annexation, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5688 - 2017-09-19
and entered judgment dismissing these complaints. ¶6 With respect to the Edwards annexation, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5688 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
. ¶29 This standard is similar to that used in civil cases to decide a motion to dismiss for failure
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51070 - 2010-06-14
. ¶29 This standard is similar to that used in civil cases to decide a motion to dismiss for failure
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51070 - 2010-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to dismiss this case due to an alleged speedy trial violation. Smith’s appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980681 - 2025-07-08
motion to dismiss this case due to an alleged speedy trial violation. Smith’s appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980681 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
Northridge Company v. W.R. Grace & Company
the trial court's dismissal of Northridge's complaint. The supreme court summarized the factual background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8989 - 2017-09-19
the trial court's dismissal of Northridge's complaint. The supreme court summarized the factual background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8989 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The State agreed to dismiss and read in charges in two other cases. As to a sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932652 - 2025-03-25
. The State agreed to dismiss and read in charges in two other cases. As to a sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932652 - 2025-03-25
State v. Matthew C. Janssen
of the circuit court for Outagamie County, John A. Des Jardins, Judge. The circuit court dismissed the state
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17253 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Outagamie County, John A. Des Jardins, Judge. The circuit court dismissed the state
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17253 - 2005-03-31
D.S. Farms v. Northern States Power Company
that the farm's complaint should be dismissed under the doctrine of laches. NSP argues that because the farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7983 - 2005-03-31
that the farm's complaint should be dismissed under the doctrine of laches. NSP argues that because the farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7983 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 4
administrator and a writ of mandamus compelling WEC to do so. The legislators then filed a motion to dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912027 - 2025-02-07
administrator and a writ of mandamus compelling WEC to do so. The legislators then filed a motion to dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912027 - 2025-02-07