Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 61171 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 61171 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. John Henry Balsewicz
, Balsewicz appealed from the judgments of conviction. We rejected his claims on appeal; see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5253 - 2005-03-31
, Balsewicz appealed from the judgments of conviction. We rejected his claims on appeal; see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5253 - 2005-03-31
William F. Kelsey v. Jens Otto Luebow
stipulation. Alternatively, he moved for “relief from the … stipulation,” claiming that it contained terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31
stipulation. Alternatively, he moved for “relief from the … stipulation,” claiming that it contained terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald A. Kozinski
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief, claiming that his trial lawyer did not give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12101 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief, claiming that his trial lawyer did not give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12101 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randall W. Edwards
assault of a child. He claims that the trial court erred: (1) in admitting expert testimony concerning
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11394 - 2005-03-31
assault of a child. He claims that the trial court erred: (1) in admitting expert testimony concerning
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11394 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William D. Olson
for postconviction relief asking that he be permitted to withdraw his guilty pleas. He also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8359 - 2017-09-19
for postconviction relief asking that he be permitted to withdraw his guilty pleas. He also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8359 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 131
, 2003, United Rentals filed a claim against the City for a refund on the $48,756.60 paid on rented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28806 - 2014-09-15
, 2003, United Rentals filed a claim against the City for a refund on the $48,756.60 paid on rented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28806 - 2014-09-15
Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
, so as to preclude their claims. BACKGROUND ¶2 Neither party disputes the underlying facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30
, so as to preclude their claims. BACKGROUND ¶2 Neither party disputes the underlying facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of this claim is limited because claims of ineffective assistance by trial counsel must first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147375 - 2017-09-21
consideration of this claim is limited because claims of ineffective assistance by trial counsel must first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William D. Olson
for postconviction relief asking that he be permitted to withdraw his guilty pleas. He also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8358 - 2017-09-19
for postconviction relief asking that he be permitted to withdraw his guilty pleas. He also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8358 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
a valid accord and satisfaction with two of the plaintiffs, so as to preclude their claims. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24711 - 2017-09-21
a valid accord and satisfaction with two of the plaintiffs, so as to preclude their claims. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24711 - 2017-09-21