Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 64160 for records.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 64160 for records.
State v. Freddie Lee Carter
at closing when the prosecutor called Carter’s witnesses liars, and did not make an adequate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4137 - 2005-03-31
at closing when the prosecutor called Carter’s witnesses liars, and did not make an adequate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4137 - 2005-03-31
Bank of Luxemburg v. Denis E. Wery
.) We conclude that the record supports the trial court's implicit determination that Wery's physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13576 - 2005-03-31
.) We conclude that the record supports the trial court's implicit determination that Wery's physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13576 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence imposed.” State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20323 - 2014-09-15
unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence imposed.” State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This claim has no merit. The record shows that the parties stipulated to the exhibits that could be sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100715 - 2017-09-21
. This claim has no merit. The record shows that the parties stipulated to the exhibits that could be sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kim A. Dasko
peremptory challenges. We conclude that the record reveals that the trial court erred in not removing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4340 - 2017-09-19
peremptory challenges. We conclude that the record reveals that the trial court erred in not removing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4340 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant presents only conclusory allegations or when the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216063 - 2018-07-24
the defendant presents only conclusory allegations or when the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216063 - 2018-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS
: Can I? THE COURT: Sure. (The defendant conferring with attorney off the record.) THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
: Can I? THE COURT: Sure. (The defendant conferring with attorney off the record.) THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
Northeast Corporate Centre v. Board of Review of the City of Glendale
with the subpoena. I think it’s significant there was no effort, there is no evidence here on this record of any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14584 - 2005-03-31
with the subpoena. I think it’s significant there was no effort, there is no evidence here on this record of any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14584 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, a recording of a 911 call. The Davis court stated: Statements are nontestimonial when made in the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34813 - 2008-12-08
, a recording of a 911 call. The Davis court stated: Statements are nontestimonial when made in the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34813 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
otherwise noted. No. 2022AP2154-CRNM 2 report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775975 - 2024-03-20
otherwise noted. No. 2022AP2154-CRNM 2 report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775975 - 2024-03-20