Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26391 - 26400 of 92439 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 1 Set Guguak Lima Puluh Kota.
Search results 26391 - 26400 of 92439 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 1 Set Guguak Lima Puluh Kota.
Lynn M. Sura v. Franklin J. Sura
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Franklin J. Sura appeals from a judgment divorcing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15703 - 2005-03-31
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Franklin J. Sura appeals from a judgment divorcing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15703 - 2005-03-31
Caren C. v. Robin M.
: Wayne J. marik, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, P.J.[1] Robin M. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3701 - 2005-03-31
: Wayne J. marik, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, P.J.[1] Robin M. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3701 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
at sentencing. It provides that: (1) Whenever a person charged with a crime will be a repeater … under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
at sentencing. It provides that: (1) Whenever a person charged with a crime will be a repeater … under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
., Neubauer, P.J., and Anderson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Darrell Galvin appeals from a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56489 - 2014-09-15
., Neubauer, P.J., and Anderson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Darrell Galvin appeals from a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56489 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
., Neubauer, P.J., and Anderson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Darrell Galvin appeals from a judgment convicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56489 - 2010-11-09
., Neubauer, P.J., and Anderson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Darrell Galvin appeals from a judgment convicting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56489 - 2010-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We reject Hoppe’s multiplicity argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817982 - 2024-06-25
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We reject Hoppe’s multiplicity argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817982 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Randolph A. Clark
A. WAGNER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Randolph A. Clark appeals from an order revoking for one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5197 - 2017-09-19
A. WAGNER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Randolph A. Clark appeals from an order revoking for one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5197 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. HAUGHNEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Hagedorn, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183376 - 2017-09-21
. HAUGHNEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Hagedorn, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Reversed. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This is a negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108938 - 2017-09-21
. Reversed. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This is a negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108938 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
: Steven g. Bauer, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18
: Steven g. Bauer, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18