Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2641 - 2650 of 3970 for davie.
Search results 2641 - 2650 of 3970 for davie.
[PDF]
State v. James L. Holloway
favorable to the defendant. State v. Davis, 144 Wis.2d 852, 855, 425 N.W.2d 411, 412 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8316 - 2017-09-19
favorable to the defendant. State v. Davis, 144 Wis.2d 852, 855, 425 N.W.2d 411, 412 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8316 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: DONALD T. HASSIN and J. MAC DAVIS, Judges. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32501 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: DONALD T. HASSIN and J. MAC DAVIS, Judges. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32501 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398946 - 2021-07-28
., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398946 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. It stated that based on the holding in Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006), 911 calls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211706 - 2018-04-24
. It stated that based on the holding in Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006), 911 calls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211706 - 2018-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Baumgarten’s initial story did not cause the jury to abdicate its fact-finding role. See State v. Davis, 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88800 - 2014-09-15
Baumgarten’s initial story did not cause the jury to abdicate its fact-finding role. See State v. Davis, 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶15, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823 (citation omitted). When a defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251811 - 2019-12-23
. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶15, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823 (citation omitted). When a defendant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251811 - 2019-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to police with the “primary purpose” of “enabl[ing] police ... to meet an ongoing emergency.” Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988747 - 2025-07-29
to police with the “primary purpose” of “enabl[ing] police ... to meet an ongoing emergency.” Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988747 - 2025-07-29
State v. Daniel Smith
to the defendant and the requested instruction. State v. Davis, 144 Wis.2d 852, 855, 425 N.W.2d 411, 412 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10827 - 2005-03-31
to the defendant and the requested instruction. State v. Davis, 144 Wis.2d 852, 855, 425 N.W.2d 411, 412 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10827 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
S. BASILIERE, Judges. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398591 - 2021-07-28
S. BASILIERE, Judges. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398591 - 2021-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
how trial counsel’s examination technique was arguably prejudicial. See State v. Davis, 95 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148976 - 2017-09-21
how trial counsel’s examination technique was arguably prejudicial. See State v. Davis, 95 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148976 - 2017-09-21