Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2641 - 2650 of 29967 for de.
Search results 2641 - 2650 of 29967 for de.
[PDF]
Michael J. Schultz v. Village of Stoddard
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24564 - 2017-09-21
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Barry A. Bullard
conduct presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3339 - 2017-09-19
conduct presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3339 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Caryl J. Keip v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
be deferential rather than de novo, the Court noted that even where full knowledge of the factual setting could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3365 - 2017-09-19
be deferential rather than de novo, the Court noted that even where full knowledge of the factual setting could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3365 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
” is reviewed de novo. State v. Hindsley, 2000 WI App 130, ¶22, 237 Wis. 2d 358, 614 N.W.2d 48. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122397 - 2014-09-24
” is reviewed de novo. State v. Hindsley, 2000 WI App 130, ¶22, 237 Wis. 2d 358, 614 N.W.2d 48. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122397 - 2014-09-24
State v. Randolph Scott
we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13488 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13488 - 2005-03-31
American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
—is hotly contested by the parties. American Family, as expected, urges us to consider the issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12360 - 2005-03-31
—is hotly contested by the parties. American Family, as expected, urges us to consider the issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 102
court. We review a circuit court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36717 - 2014-09-15
court. We review a circuit court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36717 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
48, ¶12, 279 Wis. 2d 742, 695 N.W.2d 277. However, this court reviews de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257975 - 2020-04-16
48, ¶12, 279 Wis. 2d 742, 695 N.W.2d 277. However, this court reviews de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257975 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a restitution award.3 On de novo review, the circuit court ordered restitution for certain discrete items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363232 - 2021-05-05
a restitution award.3 On de novo review, the circuit court ordered restitution for certain discrete items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363232 - 2021-05-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
, that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. ¶6 As noted, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49565 - 2014-09-15
, that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. ¶6 As noted, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49565 - 2014-09-15