Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2641 - 2650 of 4122 for in q.
Search results 2641 - 2650 of 4122 for in q.
[PDF]
State v. Charles A. Wallace
that he had observed some plastic in [Wallace’s] rectal area. Q: …[W]hat happened after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3441 - 2017-09-19
that he had observed some plastic in [Wallace’s] rectal area. Q: …[W]hat happened after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3441 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
disagree. ¶36 With regard to Hess, Earls complains of the following exchange at trial: Q: Did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138827 - 2015-04-07
disagree. ¶36 With regard to Hess, Earls complains of the following exchange at trial: Q: Did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138827 - 2015-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
additional officers were diverted from their duties to deal with Eggum: Q: Chief, how many officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201428 - 2017-11-08
additional officers were diverted from their duties to deal with Eggum: Q: Chief, how many officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201428 - 2017-11-08
State v. James D. Miller
cross-examination, this exchange occurred: Q. Do you recall telling [Lacey] that you had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26067 - 2006-08-01
cross-examination, this exchange occurred: Q. Do you recall telling [Lacey] that you had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26067 - 2006-08-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶36 With regard to Hess, Earls complains of the following exchange at trial: Q: Did you ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138827 - 2017-09-21
. ¶36 With regard to Hess, Earls complains of the following exchange at trial: Q: Did you ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138827 - 2017-09-21
State v. Reuben G. May
the presence of the jury. The court permitted the prosecutor to continue questioning, as follows: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15676 - 2005-03-31
the presence of the jury. The court permitted the prosecutor to continue questioning, as follows: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15676 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony, the following exchange occurred between the State and Krzoska: Q: [W]hen you were discussing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399172 - 2021-07-27
testimony, the following exchange occurred between the State and Krzoska: Q: [W]hen you were discussing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399172 - 2021-07-27
Town of Baraboo v. Village of West Baraboo
when being deposed by the Town’s counsel: Q So, at the end of the meeting, I take it, you had explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17924 - 2005-05-24
when being deposed by the Town’s counsel: Q So, at the end of the meeting, I take it, you had explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17924 - 2005-05-24
State v. Tyrone Booker
brief: Q. What did it show? A. It was a porno video. Q. How much of it did you watch? A. Like five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19101 - 2005-08-30
brief: Q. What did it show? A. It was a porno video. Q. How much of it did you watch? A. Like five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19101 - 2005-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
examination of Guttu as follows: Q …. Well, the Court found at the [presentencing plea] withdrawal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89657 - 2014-09-15
examination of Guttu as follows: Q …. Well, the Court found at the [presentencing plea] withdrawal hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89657 - 2014-09-15