Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2641 - 2650 of 17097 for probate/1000.
Search results 2641 - 2650 of 17097 for probate/1000.
State v. Thomas William Koeppen
stayed these sentences and ordered Koeppen to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10772 - 2005-03-31
stayed these sentences and ordered Koeppen to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10772 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, and to complete 15 years of probation. He was also fined $5,000, ordered to pay costs, and ordered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293169 - 2020-09-30
, and to complete 15 years of probation. He was also fined $5,000, ordered to pay costs, and ordered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293169 - 2020-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment concerning the same property, and that its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment concerning the same property, and that its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
[PDF]
State v. Thomas William Koeppen
to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus further ordered that the probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10772 - 2017-09-20
to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus further ordered that the probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10772 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Wolter
while intoxicated, and from an order denying reconsideration of the probation sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15984 - 2017-09-21
while intoxicated, and from an order denying reconsideration of the probation sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Pingel’s probation. Pingel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Pingel’s probation. Pingel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Sexton’s probation. Sexton was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262712 - 2020-06-02
for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Sexton’s probation. Sexton was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262712 - 2020-06-02
State v. Carl Simonetto
of possessing child pornography, challenges a condition of probation that he not “go where children may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15166 - 2005-03-31
of possessing child pornography, challenges a condition of probation that he not “go where children may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frances Nienhardt
-2- her to stay out of the city of Cedarburg during the duration of her probation. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8285 - 2017-09-19
-2- her to stay out of the city of Cedarburg during the duration of her probation. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8285 - 2017-09-19
The Estate of Ann M. Ernst v. Dennis John Ernst
action and that the evidence does not support the probate court’s conclusion. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12976 - 2005-03-31
action and that the evidence does not support the probate court’s conclusion. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12976 - 2005-03-31