Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26411 - 26420 of 30059 for de.

State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
challenge the seizure of the items from the safe, is a matter of law which this court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12485 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245557 - 2019-08-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
recommitment hearing is … a question of law we review de novo.” S.L.L., 387 Wis. 2d 333, ¶10. ¶20 Rick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568442 - 2022-09-20

[PDF] WI App 50
-representation was violated presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 204. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35920 - 2014-09-15

Dairyland Fuels, Inc. v. State
). Despite our de novo standard of review, however, we may benefit from the circuit court’s analysis. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15530 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Kanarowski, 170 Wis. 2d 504, 509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32621 - 2008-05-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the arbitrator exceeded her authority is a question of law for de novo review. Sands, 328 Wis. 2d 647, ¶48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82296 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
, but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Kalal, 2002
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20713 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Elmer Ritter v. Peggy S. Ross
of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. We review constitutional issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9366 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. ¶8 Here, the trial court agreed with Wesley that, given the lack of a strategic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65601 - 2011-06-14