Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26431 - 26440 of 30059 for de.
Search results 26431 - 26440 of 30059 for de.
Joseph Kuehn v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc.
and the [Kuehns]’ counsel action on this account is de minimus. ¶10 In addition, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6442 - 2005-03-31
and the [Kuehns]’ counsel action on this account is de minimus. ¶10 In addition, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6442 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient or prejudicial are each questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352008 - 2021-04-01
performance was deficient or prejudicial are each questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352008 - 2021-04-01
[PDF]
312. ¶17 Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that we review de novo. Chapman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969448 - 2025-06-12
312. ¶17 Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that we review de novo. Chapman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969448 - 2025-06-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
232, 634 N.W.2d 109. “We review the legal issues de novo. However, the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768307 - 2024-02-27
232, 634 N.W.2d 109. “We review the legal issues de novo. However, the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768307 - 2024-02-27
[PDF]
WI APP 50
purposes presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶23; City of South Milwaukee v. Kester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142164 - 2017-09-21
purposes presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶23; City of South Milwaukee v. Kester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142164 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11968 - 2017-09-21
de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11968 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gary Richards v. First Union Securities, Inc.
review the question of law de novo and reverse if the exercise of discretion is based on an error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18312 - 2017-09-21
review the question of law de novo and reverse if the exercise of discretion is based on an error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18312 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 184
is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27, ¶14, 251 Wis. 2d 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34606 - 2011-06-14
is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27, ¶14, 251 Wis. 2d 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34606 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI APP 189
omitted). Whether a reconfinement court violates the statutes, however, is subject to our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34700 - 2014-09-15
omitted). Whether a reconfinement court violates the statutes, however, is subject to our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kathleen Rintelman v. Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Milwaukee, Inc.
to immunity under the statute is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See Urban, 2001 WI 63, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20012 - 2017-09-21
to immunity under the statute is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. See Urban, 2001 WI 63, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20012 - 2017-09-21