Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26431 - 26440 of 45781 for even.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, on which Shi was copied. Even if Shi had been able to carry his burden of showing that the Schauer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116659 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Tong T.
at the postconviction hearing that it would have imposed the same sentence even if it had been given the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5687 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
of the defendant’s parole does not mean that it is not also in effect while the defendant is in prison. Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14958 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
the trial was initially scheduled for. Even assuming that the defense was sufficiently prepared, Alex did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30872 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not even going [to] argue about Counts 2 through 8. That’s a waste of time. I think [the prosecutor’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158267 - 2017-09-21

State v. Bernard W. Harris
even remotely resembling it.” This is the issue decided in State v. Gautschi, 2000 WI App 274, 240 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2757 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
to determine the weight given to various sentencing factors). He argues that even so, the court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28217 - 2007-02-26

COURT OF APPEALS
at trial to find the requisite guilt, we may not overturn a verdict even if we believe the jury should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 682 N.W.2d 433. Furthermore, even if we were to consider Jemison’s clearly stronger argument in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041687 - 2025-11-25

City of Oshkosh v. Gail L. Palecek
that even if the evidence was minimally relevant, it was unfairly prejudicial. We disagree. While she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11608 - 2005-03-31