Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26431 - 26440 of 76627 for judgment for u s.
Search results 26431 - 26440 of 76627 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
State v. Patricia T.
Patricia T.’s parental rights to Carla, then eleven, and Sylvester, then five. On August 22, 2000, less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3501 - 2017-09-19
Patricia T.’s parental rights to Carla, then eleven, and Sylvester, then five. On August 22, 2000, less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3501 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We agree with the circuit court that D.L.’s habeas claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206911 - 2018-01-17
. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We agree with the circuit court that D.L.’s habeas claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206911 - 2018-01-17
State v. Roger L. Eternicka
the jury that on May 31, 1992, C.B.'s mother and D.J. were baby sitting for C.B. On June 1, while C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8684 - 2005-03-31
the jury that on May 31, 1992, C.B.'s mother and D.J. were baby sitting for C.B. On June 1, while C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8684 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald T.
attempted to violate s. 940.01 on or after the child's 14th birthday or is alleged to have violated s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9082 - 2017-09-19
attempted to violate s. 940.01 on or after the child's 14th birthday or is alleged to have violated s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9082 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Eternicka
the petition would inform the jury that on May 31, 1992, C.B.'s mother and D.J. were baby sitting for C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8684 - 2017-09-19
the petition would inform the jury that on May 31, 1992, C.B.'s mother and D.J. were baby sitting for C.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8684 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 51.61(1)(g)4. because the County did not “explain the alternatives to [F.E.K.’s] medication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2015-04-29
. Stat. § 51.61(1)(g)4. because the County did not “explain the alternatives to [F.E.K.’s] medication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140986 - 2015-04-29
State v. Patricia T.
On March 3, 2000, the State filed a petition seeking to terminate Patricia T.’s parental rights to Carla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3501 - 2005-03-31
On March 3, 2000, the State filed a petition seeking to terminate Patricia T.’s parental rights to Carla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3501 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with R.T. Additionally, there is a history of domestic violence between S.N.B. and R.T.’s father.2 When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
with R.T. Additionally, there is a history of domestic violence between S.N.B. and R.T.’s father.2 When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with R.T. Additionally, there is a history of domestic violence between S.N.B. and R.T.’s father.2 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
with R.T. Additionally, there is a history of domestic violence between S.N.B. and R.T.’s father.2 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Andre E. Dixon
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6357 - 2017-09-19
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6357 - 2017-09-19