Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26441 - 26450 of 59208 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 26441 - 26450 of 59208 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Jackie Green
. ΒΆ1 BROWN, P.J.[1] This is a sentence credit case. Jackie Green claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16208 - 2005-03-31
. ΒΆ1 BROWN, P.J.[1] This is a sentence credit case. Jackie Green claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16208 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles D. Brabant
of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion after a hearing. We, too, rejected the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14629 - 2005-03-31
of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion after a hearing. We, too, rejected the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph McGowan
, appeals orders denying his claim for additional sentence credit. He asserts a right to 311 more days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5666 - 2017-09-19
, appeals orders denying his claim for additional sentence credit. He asserts a right to 311 more days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Stewart
to police. By postconviction motion, Stewart claimed that the prosecution NO. 97-0149-CR 2 had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
to police. By postconviction motion, Stewart claimed that the prosecution NO. 97-0149-CR 2 had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jane I. Peckham
Peckham appeals an order denying her motion for sentence modification. She claims that her sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14886 - 2005-03-31
Peckham appeals an order denying her motion for sentence modification. She claims that her sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14886 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (1987-88). Huber also explicitly did not seek to challenge his revocation order. If Huber claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30292 - 2014-09-15
) (1987-88). Huber also explicitly did not seek to challenge his revocation order. If Huber claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30292 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jane I. Peckham
for sentence modification. She claims that her sentences on convictions for theft, issuing a worthless check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14886 - 2017-09-21
for sentence modification. She claims that her sentences on convictions for theft, issuing a worthless check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14886 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
Thomas J. Boron v. Elizabeth J. Bart
September 11, 1991, at eight percent per annum. In March 1993, Bart claimed that Boron owed her $537.95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14861 - 2005-03-31
September 11, 1991, at eight percent per annum. In March 1993, Bart claimed that Boron owed her $537.95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14861 - 2005-03-31
Allen J. Thomas v. State
. He claims that the 1976 judgment violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31
. He claims that the 1976 judgment violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31