Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26441 - 26450 of 30177 for de.
Search results 26441 - 26450 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Willie W. Henderson
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. (2) “However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6549 - 2017-09-19
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. (2) “However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6549 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 141
contract. We review a trial court’s summary judgment determination de novo, applying the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33750 - 2014-09-15
contract. We review a trial court’s summary judgment determination de novo, applying the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33750 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88167 - 2014-09-15
the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88167 - 2014-09-15
Cheryl Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company
to interpret a statute as it applies to a set of facts. This presents a question of law which we approach de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16867 - 2005-03-31
to interpret a statute as it applies to a set of facts. This presents a question of law which we approach de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16867 - 2005-03-31
Reginald C. Bruskewitz v. City of Madison
. McCaughtry, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 385, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3055 - 2005-03-31
. McCaughtry, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 385, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3055 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as enunciated in Steven H., presents “a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768838 - 2024-02-28
, as enunciated in Steven H., presents “a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768838 - 2024-02-28
2007 WI App 235
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards and methodology as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30458 - 2007-11-27
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards and methodology as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30458 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, including whether trial counsel performed deficiently, is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399842 - 2021-07-29
, including whether trial counsel performed deficiently, is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399842 - 2021-07-29
[PDF]
Paul D. Atkinson v. Donald D. Mentzel
275, 280 (1978). Whether an ambiguity exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10259 - 2017-09-20
275, 280 (1978). Whether an ambiguity exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10259 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” Id. (italics added). DISCUSSION ¶19 On appeal, Fortes seeks plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135520 - 2015-03-24
review de novo.” Id. (italics added). DISCUSSION ¶19 On appeal, Fortes seeks plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135520 - 2015-03-24