Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26441 - 26450 of 29721 for des.
Search results 26441 - 26450 of 29721 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
is a determination subject to de novo review. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73905 - 2011-11-14
is a determination subject to de novo review. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73905 - 2011-11-14
State v. Gary L. Stibb
of the defendant’s right to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4485 - 2005-03-31
of the defendant’s right to effective assistance presents a legal question which we review de novo. Id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4485 - 2005-03-31
Cheryl Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company
to interpret a statute as it applies to a set of facts. This presents a question of law which we approach de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16867 - 2005-03-31
to interpret a statute as it applies to a set of facts. This presents a question of law which we approach de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16867 - 2005-03-31
Robert Kerl v. Dennis Rasmussen, Inc.
¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5252 - 2005-03-31
¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5252 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 15
by the trial court’s cogent analyses of the complex issues with which it had to deal, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34946 - 2009-01-27
by the trial court’s cogent analyses of the complex issues with which it had to deal, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34946 - 2009-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Kanarowski, 170 Wis. 2d 504, 509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32621 - 2008-05-05
jeopardy is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Kanarowski, 170 Wis. 2d 504, 509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32621 - 2008-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
in his second postconviction motion is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80031 - 2012-03-26
in his second postconviction motion is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80031 - 2012-03-26
2007 WI APP 186
which we decide de novo.[7] Langone v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2007 WI App 121, ¶8, ___ Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29817 - 2007-08-27
which we decide de novo.[7] Langone v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2007 WI App 121, ¶8, ___ Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29817 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292483 - 2020-09-29
a grant of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292483 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
Dale M. Buegel v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
(1983). As such, it is subject to de novo review. See id. The doctrine of claim preclusion states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6484 - 2017-09-19
(1983). As such, it is subject to de novo review. See id. The doctrine of claim preclusion states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6484 - 2017-09-19