Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26451 - 26460 of 52768 for address.
Search results 26451 - 26460 of 52768 for address.
Leslie A. Watkins v. City of Madison
the question, but was unaware of a response by the bailiff. Her dissenting comment also addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7718 - 2005-03-31
the question, but was unaware of a response by the bailiff. Her dissenting comment also addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7718 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is not entitled to relief….” Id. at 309-10. The court’s order denying the motion only addressed Poolo’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36048 - 2014-09-15
is not entitled to relief….” Id. at 309-10. The court’s order denying the motion only addressed Poolo’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36048 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2d __, __ N.W.2d __, which addressed the No. 2013AP1809 3 same legal issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109102 - 2017-09-21
. 2d __, __ N.W.2d __, which addressed the No. 2013AP1809 3 same legal issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and correctly concludes they are without merit, we address them no further. Further, by pleading guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245861 - 2019-09-04
and correctly concludes they are without merit, we address them no further. Further, by pleading guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245861 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and properly concludes that they are without merit, we address them no further. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244238 - 2019-07-31
and properly concludes that they are without merit, we address them no further. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244238 - 2019-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and ten years’ extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the record supports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214501 - 2018-06-19
and ten years’ extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the record supports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214501 - 2018-06-19
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction. We will not address Minniecheske’s assertion that the 1997 conviction should be vacated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91728 - 2013-01-22
conviction. We will not address Minniecheske’s assertion that the 1997 conviction should be vacated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91728 - 2013-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2023AP2251 2 address. In addition, we find
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962536 - 2025-05-30
Statutes are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2023AP2251 2 address. In addition, we find
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962536 - 2025-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report addresses whether Sauceda’s pleas were knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475086 - 2022-01-26
report addresses whether Sauceda’s pleas were knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475086 - 2022-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of...
acknowledge his guilt. The State does not address that rationale on appeal or specifically challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28570 - 2007-03-26
acknowledge his guilt. The State does not address that rationale on appeal or specifically challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28570 - 2007-03-26

